(Front row, Archbishop Richard Anthony Burke, SPS, Archbishop of Benin City and Administrator of Warri diocese)
Commentary:
We have been at the forefront of transparency, responsibility, and accountability within our African Church. We have pointed out the sad issues of sexual and emotional exploitation of Africans within our Catholic fold. We, know that the church is essentially holy as the church of God (cf. John 8:23), while human weak and imperfect, drawing enormous strength from her divine master and savior, Jesus Christ. In spite of that only the truth can set free (John 8:32). Even Jesus when he was confronted about his identity, though he could have easily denied declared assertively the truth regarding his honest identity (Jn. 18:4-9).
Few months ago, the Vatican acted against two bishops in the Central African Republic, with the President of that country's episcopal conference and archbishop of Bangui resigning because of allegation that their priests were living profligate lifestyles, and in concubinage. The priests sided with their bishops and went on strike, in support of their bishops and in defiance to the Vatican. They asserted that they felt that the Vatican was playing double-standard, because white bishops and priests who were in similar situations were left untouched. This white holier-than-thou and unequal treatment is what makes the case of archbishop Burke interesting, and even more intriguing as to how the Vatican will treat this case. The transparency and integrity of the Vatican is at stake here.
This case also tend to minimize the subtle and hideous supposition that it is only African, or non-European priests, who have difficulties leaving out their priestly commitments.
Now, Archbishop Burke's case would now show how much racism is not a case when it pertains to a non-African bishop at the centre of sexual abuses. This is a litmus test for the Vatican and one that is critical for the mode of equal or differential treatment within the same church. Currently, many Africans, including bishops and priests, inwardly believes that the current Pope Benedict XVI is very not comfortable, like the late Pope John Paul II, with the African realities, issues of inculturation, and the integration of the African church into the full life of the universal church.
The poor choices of episcopal candidates, some showing inferior credentials, indicates how this papacy is ready to compare and contrast, in creating second tier or third class bishops, that would make the western bishops feel superior. The arguments among many western clergy today is that some Africans and Asians are ordained priests and bishops, because of the lack of qualitative candidates, such of the needs.
This kind of subjugation of the African clergy within the reasoning and action of western clerics, attempting to diminish the quantitative and quantum leap in vocations and faith response on the continent, seems supported by some of the calibre of bishops Rome has named for some dioceses in Africa- sounding all too often, like good for them. Afterall, it is not us! Such thinking hurts the sense of pride of the African Catholic, and minimize the ideal notion of the ideology of Catholicism as framing universality- a true Catholicity of spirit, belongingness, and constituted purview of human convivality- a family or assembly of God's faithful people.
Having stated this, we know that the Church is made up of weak, sinners, and imperfect people (Hebrew 5: 2-3, New Catholic Catechism (NCC) #823-828). The church calls us then to remember that All members of the Church, including her ministers must acknowledge that the are sinners. In everyone, the weeds of sin will still be mixed with the good wheat of the Gospel until the end of time. Hence, the Churchg gathers sinners already caught in Christ's salvation but still on the way to holiness" (NCC #827).
While calling for transparency, responsibility, and accountability, we owe it as a first duty to encourage prayers for the priests. It is not easy being a Christian, talkless of the added responsibility of being a leader of the Christian assembly. The evil one would always continue to roar and roam, looking for those to devour (1 Peter 5:8-9 ).
As African Christians and Catholics, we must realize that none of us is without sin. There, we "go but for the grace of God." But for the avoidance of scandal, the forging of charity, and in the spirit of forgiveness, as a sign of renewal and reconciliation, the church must continue to uphold core values that are essential to building community, sanctifying the body of Christ- the Church, and offering a pleasing offering (1 Peter 2:5), in spite of imperfection, weakness, and sin, to God, to pursue holiness as the ultimate goal of our lives toward our salvation (Lev. 19: 2; Matt: 5:48; 1 Peter 1:16).
It is here that the demand for handling cases with justice toward the goal of creating peace and harmony become paramout. Our call is not intended to discount or vilify the good works, even priests and bishops, nuns, and laity in their work of the faith have, even in their struggles and challenges, worthily and credibly rendered. In the intermix between the good and bad, even when the bad and ugly rear its head, it cannot take away from the good that has been performed.
We, also indulgently request a thorough investigation, so that the good name of people are not just simply ruined, due to false accusations. We want a thorough, sound, and transparent investigation in this matter. Currently, in Kenya, an Italian Comboni missionary, Fr. Kizito Sessena is being accussed of molesting minors. The African writer, Malidoma Patrice Some, had also pointed out in his book, Of Water, and the Spirit, how he and other students at a Catholic High School were despicably subjected to sexual molestation, harrassment, and inappropriate touching by some priests.
In the light of these events, while we honour, respect, and laud the intrepid, bold, and courageous witness of western missionaries in their evangelizing mission, some of their ways has continued to be a cog in the ways many Africans perceive the gospel and the church. The church cannot continue to harbour the lifestyles and dubious behaviours that harm not just victims, but equally and greatly hurt and work against her own interests of evangelization and salvation, thus minimizing her influence and denting her identity.
*******************
Archbishop Richard Burke's Folks taken aback and angry
Tipperary Star
Date: 29 October 2009
By Staff Reporter
By Eoin Kelleher
PARISHIONERS in Fethard are surprised and disappointed about the allegations being made against local man Archbishop Richard Burke, a Kiltegan Bishop who served with the Society of African Missions (SMA).
Appointed as the Bishop of Warri in Niger
ADVERTISEMENTia prior to his promotion last year as Metropolitan Archbishop of Benin City by Pope Benedict XVI, Archbishop Burke came under fire during the week when Dolores Atwood - a Nigerian-born Canadian politician - made allegations in her book about what she says was an inappropriate relationship between herself and the Archbishop when she was under the age of consent.
One local man who spoke to the Tipperary Star said older members of the parish felt let down. The parish remains strong, and committed to their faith. "We have a great parish priest here," he said. Still, "we're shocked. It's totally against the run of the mill."
The family of Archbishop Richard Burke hail from the Lisronagh area originally, though he grew up in Fethard before moving to Africa with the SMA. "He was one of our own. You couldn't have seen this coming. People feel let down." However, discussion in the village has centred more on the recent death of a local man, rather than the allegations contained in Ms Atwood's book.
"He seems to have taken control of the situation. He blames himself. Nobody really knows yet what has happened."
New Catholic church crisis as Irish Archbishop suspended by Vatican in sex abuse probe
Archbishop believed to be in U.S. after being removed from post
By
JAMES O'BRIEN
IrishCentral.com
Father Tim column / Angry? Anglican? The Catholic Church wants you! / Click here
An Irish-born Archbishop has been suspended by the Vatican over an allegation that he carried on a 20-year relationship with a woman that began when she was only 14.
The archbishop is currently said to be in the U.S. and once served in New Jersey.
Archbishop Richard Burke, from Fethard, County Tipperary, a member of the Kiltegan Fathers, a missionary order in County Wicklow, has been removed from his post as Archbishop of Benin in Nigeria after church officials described the person who made the allegations, Dolores Attwood (40) now resident in Canada as as "a credible witness."
It is believed the abuse started in 1983 when Ms Atwood was just 14 and a patient in a Catholic hospital in Nigeria. She kept notes, tickets and other documentation of the relationship which she gave to Catholic authorities.
Atwood stated she was 14 and in hospital in Wari Nigeria in April 1983 when Burke, then a priest, kissed her in her bed and fondled her when the lights went out.
"I was sick in the hospital with fever and Fr. Burke came to visit me. When he and I were alone in my hospital room he touched and kissed me in a very inappropriate manner," she said.
She says that they had full intercourse a month later.
She said the relationship went on for five more years until Burke left Nigeria for the U.S.
Atwood states, "During the past 25 years I did not tell anyone of our relationship, because he told me not to talk about it to anyone no matter what and also fear of the negative impacts on him and the Catholic Church. Richard Burke left Nigeria in 1989 when he was sent to New Jersey in the USA and then back to Ireland with St. Patrick’s Society.
"In 1993 I met my husband, who was a Canadian volunteer working in Nigeria, while I was studying at University. My husband and I were married in 1995 in Canada and have had 3 children together. From 1989 to 1995 Father Burke and I continued communications by letters.
"When I told him that I was planning to get married in 1994, he became upset with me and told me that I should never tell anyone about the relationship between himself and I.
"Richard Burke returned to Nigeria in 1996 as Bishop of Warri Diocese. From 1996 to 1998, my husband and I left Canada and worked in Thailand.
"In 1998 Bishop Burke and I began regular communications by phone again. In 2000 while I was expecting my second child, Bishop Burke said that he would help get my youngest sister to come to Canada for a visit.
"I suspected that there was something not right when things did not work out and Bishop Burke began to take a keen interest in my youngest sister's well being. Once again, our relationship intensified with frequent amorous telephone conversations.
"In 2005 I found out that Bishop Burke had had a sexual relationship with my youngest sister.
The “friendship” between Bishop Burke and myself began to deteriorate as, once again, I started to become aware of other young girls that he was molesting.
In fact, I suspect that Richard Burke has molested or sexually abused hundreds of young
Nigerian girls during his time as a priest and Bishop in Nigeria. "
The Vatican-based "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith" now has jurisdiction over the matter and has suspended Archbishop Burke who was appointed to his current position in 2007 by Pope Benedict XV1.
Monsignor Charles Scicluna, a Vatican prosecutor has stated that the file on Archbishop Burke, who has been in Holy Orders for 34 years has been received and is being investigated.
Irish prelate in Nigeria withdraws from ministry after abuse charges
By Cian Molloy
Catholic News Service
DUBLIN, Ireland – An Irish archbishop who serves in Nigeria has withdrawn from active ministry while the Vatican investigates allegations of sexual abuse.
The St. Patrick’s Missionary Society, known as the Kiltegan Fathers, said Oct. 25 that the allegations against Archbishop Richard Burke of Benin City, Nigeria, are being investigated by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The charges came from a Nigerian woman, Dolores Atwood, 40, who now lives in Canada, where she is married and has run for public office.
Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, refused to comment on the issue Oct. 26.
The newspaper Irish Mail on Sunday reported Oct. 25 that Atwood claimed she had been attacked by Archbishop Burke when she was a 14-year-old hospital patient in Warri in 1983; he is said to have continued to have sexual relations with her until 2003.
Atwood lodged a formal complaint against the archbishop last year, and Kiltegan Fathers Gary Howley and John Marren met with her in Halifax, Nova Scotia, in December. Afterward, in a summary of what was discussed, Father Marren wrote: “Her allegation was very credible and was supported by corroborative evidence. ... She is a very capable person.”
The Irish Mail on Sunday also published a statement from the Kiltegan Fathers expressing “the deep sorrow and regret of the society for the suffering the complainant and her family are going through.”
“We affirmed the society’s commitment to child protection,” the statement said. “We assured her that the society’s child protection policy and procedures would be adhered to. The society offered to provide counseling for the complainant.”
Kiltegan Father Seamus O’Neill met with Archbishop Burke in Rome in January and wrote Atwood three days later, saying that “the society has accepted your statement as a credible allegation and we are now applying our society’s policy and procedures for the protection of children.” Father O’Neill said the archbishop had said he would not make any contact with Atwood while an investigation was taking place.
The Irish Mail on Sunday said Archbishop Burke reportedly contacted Atwood only hours after his meeting with Father O’Neill in Rome; the transcript of his phone conversation was published by the newspaper.
“I know that you have been hurt very deeply. And I accept full responsibility,” the transcript quoted him as saying.
Archbishop Burke was named coadjutor bishop of Warri in 1996 and became bishop in 1997; he was transferred to Benin City in 2007.
Oct 26, 2009
Sunday, October 25, 2009
11 °C Dublin » MON12 °C TUE13 °C WED14 °C YOUR WEATHER »
irishtimes.com
ireland.com
Last Updated: Sunday, October 25, 2009, 18:39
Allegations against archbishop investigated
MICHAEL O'REGAN
The Vatican is investigating an allegation of child sex abuse against an Irish-born archbishop based in Africa, his missionary order confirmed today.
Archbishop Richard Burke (60), from Clonmel, Co Tipperary, was ordained a priest for St Patrick’s Missionary Society, known as the Kiltegan Fathers, in Co Wicklow, in 1975. He was ordained a bishop in 1997, and installed as Archbishop of Benin, Nigeria, in March of last year.
In a statement, the society said it had received a complaint last December from a 40-year-old woman against Archbishop Burke.
“She alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Richard Burke. We expressed the deep sorrow and regret of the society for the suffering the complainant and her family are going through and we affirmed the society’s commitment to child protection,’’ it added.
“We assured her that the society’s child protection policy and procedures would be adhered to. The society offered to provide counselling for the complainant.’’
The statement pointed out that although Archbishop Burke was a member of the society, he had ceased to be under its jurisdiction when he became a bishop and was now under the direct jurisdiction of the Holy See.
“However, he agreed to follow the society’s child protection procedures and voluntarily withdrew from ministry while the complaint is being investigated,’’ it added.
“The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith requested that all relevant documents relating to the allegation be forwarded to Rome so that it can exercise its full jurisdiction in the matter. The society has done this.’’
The society, said the statement, had kept in contact with the complainant, and informed her regularly of the steps being taken in accordance with policy and procedures. She had also been informed of the direct jurisdiction of the Holy See in the matter.
“The society is committed to ensuring that justice is done and that no child is put at risk through the behaviour of our members,’’ it added.
The Irish Mail on Sunday featured an interview with Dolores Atwood, who said that the abuse began when she was 14 years old and a patient in a hospital at Warri, Nigeria, in April 1983.
She alleged the archbishop continued to have a sexual relationship with her as recently as 2003.
Ms Atwood, who now lives in Nova Scotia, Canada, said she believed she was “manipulated and controlled’’ as a teenager.
She said she eventually confessed the relationship to her husband because she was wracked with guilt. She wrote to the Vatican and the society reporting the allegations.
Ms Atwood said she had provided phone recordings, letters and airline tickets to Church authorities as proof of their relationship.
Irish Independent:
Archbishop accused of abusing 14-year-old girl: Damages Ireland's Catholic ImageBy John Cooney Religion Correspondent
Monday October 26 2009
THE Irish Church's standing in Rome has been dealt a further damaging blow with a high-level Vatican investigation into a complaint of child sexual abuse against a Tipperary-born archbishop.
This is the first instance of an official charge of clerical child molestation being made against an archbishop of Irish nationality, and it comes as the Irish Church is preparing "for the worst" with publication of the Murphy report on abuse in the Archdiocese of Dublin.
It was learned yesterday that Richard Burke, the 60-year-old Archbishop of Benin, a city in southern Nigeria, stepped aside earlier this year pending the outcome of an ecclesiastical trial by the Vatican's doctrinal watchdog body, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
The Kiltegan missionary archbishop from Fethard, Co Tipperary, who is believed to be in the United States, has not commented on the allegation.
He is accused by Dolores Atwood, a 40-year-old married woman now living in Canada, of sexually abusing her when she was a minor, aged 14, and ill in a Nigerian hospital that he visited as a priest.
She also alleges that she suffered "emotional torture" during a 20-year secret affair that he conducted with her contrary to his vow of celibacy.
Last night, St Patrick's Missionary Society in Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, also known as the Kiltegan Fathers, revealed it received a complaint from a 40-year-old woman against Archbishop Burke on December 16 last.
"We expressed the deep sorrow and regret of the society for the suffering the complainant and her family are going through and we affirmed the society's commitment to child protection," a statement said.
"We assured her that the society's child protection policy and procedures would be adhered to. The society offered to provide counselling for the complainant."
The statement confirmed that the society had complied with a request from the Doctrinal Congregation to send to Rome all relevant documents relating to the allegation so that Rome could exercise full jurisdiction.
"Although a member of St Patrick's Missionary Society, Archbishop Burke ceased to be under the jurisdiction of the society when he became a bishop and is now under the direct jurisdiction of the Holy See," the Kiltegan Fathers said.
It was the late Pope John Paul II who consecrated Richard Burke Bishop of the Nigerian diocese of Warri in March 1997, and in December 2007 Pope Benedict XVI promoted him to Archbishop of Benin City.
According to Monsignor Charles Scicluna, a senior advocate for the congregation, the Pope has been informed of the charges against Archbishop Burke, who will be called to Rome for interrogation before it completes its investigations under oath of confidentiality.
Disclosures
If the congregation upholds the complaint, Archbishop Burke will face permanent removal from his duties as archbishop.
But Vatican officials fear that the detailed disclosures made by Ms Atwood in a Sunday newspaper undermine his chances of a fair hearing.
Pope Benedict XVI told the Irish bishops shortly after the publication of the report into the diocese of Ferns to get to the roots of the clerical child abuse scandals.
Earlier this year the Pope also expressed his anguish at the systematic abuses contained in the Ryan report on child institutions run by religious orders.
Last February, the pontiff ordered the removal of former papal secretary, Bishop John Magee, from jurisdiction of the diocese of Cloyne pending a government investigation into his failure to enforce child protection procedures.
The Burke case is the latest sexual scandal to rock the Irish Church going back to 1992 when Bishop of Galway Eamon Casey resigned after having a son with American divorcee, Annie Murphy.
In 2002 Bishop Brendan Comiskey resigned from the diocese of Ferns over his failures in handling paedophile priests such as the late Fr Sean Fortune.
- John Cooney Religion Correspondent
Irish Independent
***************************************
Catholic Report:
Reader Comments
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 07:10 am, Dolores Atwood writes:
I am writing this note concerning the past and present conducts of ArchBishop Richard Burke S.P.S of the Arch Dioceses of Warri and Benin in Nigeria a Irish citizen. I am a 41-year-old woman who has been living in Canada since 1995 with my husband and 3 children. In 1982 as a young girl from a Muslim home I began my journey into the Catholic faith and first met Father Richard Burke a Catholic priest at Sacred Heart Cathedral in Warri Nigeria. In 1983 when I was 14 years old, I became the victim of (what I now know to be) a sexual assault. When I was 14, I was sick in the hospital with a fever and Father Burke came to visit me. When he and I were alone in my hospital room, he touched and kissed me in a very inappropriate manner. During my teenage years, I suffered through the divorce of my parents, Richard Burke was there for me and the relationship between myself and he intensified. I became so attached to Richard Burke, that there seemed to be no one else that could be a part of my life, even though I knew that he was having relations with other young Nigerian girls. During the past 25 years I did not tell anyone of our relationship, because he told me not to talk about it to anyone no matter what and also fear of the negative impacts on him and the Catholic Church. Richard Burke left Nigeria in 1989 when he was sent to New Jersey in the USA and then back to Ireland with St. Patrick’s Society. In 1993 I met my husband, who was a Canadian volunteer working in Nigeria, while I was studying at University. My husband and I were married in 1995 in Canada and have had 3 children together. From 1989 to 1995 Father Burke and I continued communications by letters. When I told him that I was planning to get married in 1994, he became upset with me and told me that I should never tell anyone about the relationship between himself and I. Richard Burke returned to Nigeria in 1996 as Bishop of Warri Diocese. From 1996 to 1998, my husband and I left Canada and worked in Thailand. In 1998 Bishop Burke and I began regular communications by phone again. In 2000 while I was expecting my second child, Bishop Burke said that he would help get my youngest sister to come to Canada for a visit. I suspected that there was something not right when things did not work out and Bishop Burke began to take a keen interest in my youngest sisters well being. Once again, our relationship intensified with frequent amorous telephone conversations. In 2005 I found out that Bishop Burke had had a sexual relationship with my youngest sister. The “friendship” between Bishop Burke and myself began to deteriorate as, once again, I started to become aware of other young girls that he was molesting. In fact, I suspect that Richard Burke has molested or sexually abused hundreds of young Nigerian girls during his time as a priest and Bishop in Nigeria. I also know that he has taped past conversations that I have had with him and have told others, including his family in Ireland as well as my husband that I am obsessed with him in order to discredit me and make me appear to be crazy. Over a year ago, following a major dispute between myself and Bishop Burke, I confessed to my husband that I had had an intimate relationship with Bishop Burke. This was the first time that I had ever told anyone of this affair. Since my confession, my husband and I have gone to marriage counseling and I have taken private counseling to deal with the stress, trauma and confusion that I have had to deal with over the past 26 years. Following my counseling sessions, I have learned that a man that I though had loved and cared for me has in fact manipulated and controlled me. I know that Richard Burke is self-serving and that he does not serve the Church. In fact the Church serves Richard Burke by providing him access to the young girls that look up to him and then become his victims of unwanted sexual advances. I believe now, that Richard Burke is a pedophile I have been corresponding with St. Patrick\\\'s Society since 2007 about this and have shared with them taped conversations that I had with Richard Burke in the past where he admits to having inapproprite sexual relations with young girls, married women, religious sisters and prostitutes. I have saved notes letters and emails that Richard Burke had sent me in the past, which I have shared with those of St. Patrick\\\'s that are \\\"investigating\\\" him. I know that Richard Burke was sent for an assessment at St. Luke\\\'s in Manchester in March of this year, and that Richard Burke is continuing with his public ministry in Nigeria and is having access to young girls in Nigeria. I do not beleive that St. Patrick\\\'s Society in Kiltegan County Wicklow, Ireland has taken my complaints seriously. I do not trust them, and believe that they are trying to help Richard Burke escape prosecution and justice for the crimes he has committed.
On Friday, August 14, 2009 at 05:01 pm, Johnson writes:
i know the archbishop personally and it is indeed very sad to see a thing like this. i do not fully know but i doubt most of the exaggerations in the text. The Lord's will be done.
On Saturday, August 15, 2009 at 07:51 am, writes:
Is n't this a lie against a man who has been working in Nigeria for so many years assisting the poor people of Nigeria. Arch-Bishop Burke is a God fearing man,he is humble and have great interest in the Poor. I am not a close person to the arch -Bishop, but I believe God will vindicate him in this serious allegation. Can this writer tell us her trauma, what is pushing her now to bring up this allegation against a man of God. I wish Arch-Bishop Burke God's protection and guidance at this critical time. I believe, time will tell. have faith in God.
On Saturday, August 15, 2009 at 08:02 am, Christy. writes:
The Arch-Bishop that I know talk less, he is hardworking and love the Poor. he is commited to his ministry as a Priest of God. What is the problem with the young lady, I hope she knows that she is dealing with God. I do not believe a word of her accusation. We pray God to intervene and put the devil to shame. Darkness has no power over the Light. God bless you Bishop Richard Burke.
On Tuesday, August 18, 2009 at 02:09 pm, Vicky writes:
Archbishop Burke is a man of God. I hope this young woman is not being used by those who are seeking power of position. This is very malicious of a married woman. Is she not happily married. What is she looking for. Anyway God sees everything, but I do not believe what she is saying about the gentle man of God.
On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 at 06:52 am, Paul. writes:
Everyone who reasons without biase would know this is a set up. My people do say thet the trap set for an Elephant may trap Him but cannot pull him down, nor stop him from going to where he planned to go. God had never deserted his people. This would not be a diffrent case. It is just time becase God is aware. I pray for the Man Of God without fear that God is on his side.
On Friday, September 11, 2009 at 08:17 pm, Nneka writes:
Be strong His Grace, and may God strenghten you through this trial. Continue to be the humble, God fearing person that we know you to be in Warri. May the Lord heal Dolores of her pains too whatever the source.
On Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 03:13 am, Nicholas writes:
Evil, evil, evil. it is self evident that this writer is an agent of satan. how can you write such malicious statement against a holy man of God. you claim that that "Richard Burke has molested or sexually abused hundreds of young Nigerian girls during his time as a priest and Bishop in Nigeria" state your case and bring your proofs. Hell awaits your soul for what you have done but more torments awaits those who prompted you to do this. You have sinned against Charity and God who is love shall cast his wrath upon you and your household.
On Friday, September 18, 2009 at 07:59 am, Okanatoto tega writes:
My lord i have always known you to be a humble and gentle man of God.and that you will continue to be for all of us in warri diocese.we will always continue to rmber you in our prayers in this trying period of yours.but for those who are behind this act,like JESUS,we will still say and tell them,FORGIVE THEM FATHER FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
On Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:35 pm, Rose writes:
A simple analysis fro9m a new non-biases d mind can tell that this story above is clearly motivated. But for God\"s sake no matter your motives, consider the life long implications for this simple man while you may just be trying to achieve your aim. If its about money like many made in the U.S.A. a while ago, then trust me, it will not work.
On Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Olukunle writes:
Ha!!! fear God! the way i see it, you must have a nature of trying your hands on white people before you finaly got one as husband.
On Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm, writes:
please my dear lady even if this were true, is this internet thing the next thing for you. This is seriously on African. what has become of your African ways
On Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Anthonia writes:
If this is true, dont worry. But if not, just find your way back to this same forum to undo the wrong you may have done to this Man that we all know so well. Let God and your conscience guide you. But I still feel this forum was not your next choice. very bad.
On Saturday, September 19, 2009 at 12:55 pm, writes:
since you published this article, why has other so called "hundreds of Nigerian girls" not written to say they testify to your claims with their personal experience of the Bishop. as someone observed in a comment earlier on this page, in case its not true, please redress it and in good time. God knows it all.
On Monday, September 21, 2009 at 10:36 am, Daniel Kevwe writes:
His Grace, be Strongand stand firm has been our Lord\'s encouragement.However, Istronglybelieve that that one doing this is not far from the household of God.God knows and sees all things, He ll vindicate youlike Sussanaand the three men in the book of Daniel.The truth llalways cometolight,keepon standing forthe truth.Stay wellmy His Grace
On Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 06:51 pm, Ferdinand writes:
Can you come out with the names and contacts of other girls that you cliam that he molested? This lady, let me give you this christian advice, go before the holy alter of God and pray for bishop Burk and pray for forgiveness of your sins. Am sure somebody must have offered you something to do this, remember God is still there, be careful what you say about men of God.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 10:44 am, helen , warri. writes:
You all are sick people ,that is why africa is were it is today. these many also touched my breaset at age of 17. it is veru said that you all because of the food and money he has ggiven you all. paul wre you not the one richard promise to send to further you studyies in london. how well do you all know this man, that you all say all this. which nigeria girl will want to come out to go through this. SHME ON YOU ARCH BISHOP RICHARD BURKE. May the good lord jurge you.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 10:57 am, Rose, Port harcourt. writes:
I find it difficult to call you bishop. You hurt this lady,confess and admit it. i konw somebody who know this lady in question,.She has a reputation for being a honest person,thant is all that I have been hearing. Some of you sound as if you were asked by richrd burke to do this and I will not be sueprise that one of his girkfriends is among. This lady is doing the church a great help.the book of ephesians chapt5:10-18.read it. Our prays are with you miss Dolores.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 11:22 am, Gina, canada writes:
Thanks Rose and Helen, There is a saying that the truth have a way of coming out.The church is so rioting and corrupt. I believe this poor lady. Richard burke will not end with her, he will continue.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 02:15 pm, joel angelo writes:
I\'m truely amazed at you all! Truely! I have heard times without number the saying that behind every rumor,there\'s an element of truth.why would a married woman confessed to this?have you ask yourselves that question?what makes you think richard burke will be innocent?what if he\'s a wolf in sheep clothing? what if his silent and calm nature is a deceptive one?what if he took advantage of your life styles as nigerians? you all should have a second thought.what if she\'s correct?i can bet you,no woman will love to know a man that had an affair with heir had also had an affair with her younger sister.what she kept as secret for 26yrs has come back to hunt her.she should have expose him then! those who think they are benefiting from him now,that are covering him or refuse to investigate for the truth,just as it came hunting her after 26yrs,it will definately come back at them because what goes around comes around!ferdinand,if this lady happen to be telling the truth and your sister is a victim and she refuse to tell the truth,how will you feel? Daniel kevwe,you are right.God sees all things! why don\'t you just let Him be the Judge? Other so called girls in nigeria can\'t come out.how many knows this is on the net?how many can access the net?what about the shame and stigma that kept this lady for 26yrs?what about the hungry life styles of this girls that makes them vulnerable? have you ever try to see the evidence of this lady?have you ever beleived that the devil was once an angel of light sitting right next to God?Anthonia you are right but someone has to stop this man.don\'t know how old how you but your sister,your cousin,your relatives even your daughter may be the next victims.i don\'t trust any of this priest anymore for all the things i have seen about them makes me never want to searve God cos i sometimes think that God is just sitting up there allowing these crazy people to have their way.(God forgive me if i\'m wrong!)Olakunle please tell the bishop to fear GOd.Rose i feel for you cos you are a woman and i realised what you mean by motivation.okonatoto tega you should be happy that God is exposing him.Nicholas becareful what you call evil.what if you are wrong?Nneka you are right.God should heal and God should also bring justice to both parties.Paul you already projected the bishop as your messiah.is that how it should be?you sound like a benefactor.Vicky God truely blesses everything.why would she be happily married?imagine being abused or taken advantage of and same person is doing same to your yunger sister,your aunty even your mom.how would you or your dad feel?christy you are right! God should intervane.that is exactly what is happening.darkness can never overcome light!working in nigeria for so many years or you mean taking advantage of nigerians for so many years?Thank you very much johnson.it\'s you alone that makes alot of sense. God will definately judge and His judgement will begin in His house.i\'m not trying to say it\'s true but you all should consider her part of the story instead you all are busy painting the bishop as a messiah.i\'m a catholic like you all.i\'ve seen what priest and so called bishops have done in terms of politics,power,sexual immorality,mis mangement of church funds and taking advantage of the less empowered people.if i come out and say it,who will beleive me? they have all the power to cover it up,their superiors they make returns to and whom they inherited it from are ready to go at any lenght to protect him. i do like you all to know that these are all the signs of the end times.i\'m not sayingi\'m innocent or free from it but it\'s a shame it\'s coming from an arch bishop who is surpose to preach against this and who people look up to as i read in your comments as messiah or elephant as the case may be, to be the one tearing the church of God apart.if all this is true,he will have no peace as there\'s no [peace for the wicked]!
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 02:18 pm, susan writes:
the bishop is a green snake under tha green grass!he is absolutely guilty! thank God someone had to stand up and talk.i could'nt myself.he his a shameless bastard.i wish and hope he perishes in hell if he does'nt repent!
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 04:42 pm, iyabo writes:
I really commend your boldness Dolores to come out publicly with this and i really do hope that the many Nigerian girls who are still sleeping with priests for the financial advantage will have a rethink, repent and stop bcos our poverty in Nigeria is not an excuse. What is wrong is wrong.It is so unfortunate that in Nigeria young girls are molested everyday and nothing is been done. Infact we are all quick to blame the girls that it is there fault. Our culture of shame will not even allow us to give the many victims of sexual abuse a fair hearing as result of the fear of stigmatization and shame many innocent girls keep silent. I\\\'m really ashamed but at the sametime not surprised at the comments of the likes of christy,paul,johnson,olukunle and rose. Our culture allows men to get away with rape, sexual harrassment and molestation. Richard Burke i\\\'m sure knows that if these evils he has committed took place in his home country he will go to prison but he is very lucky that it happened in Nigeria where we see white men as our ticket out of poverty and escape to a better life. I do not doubt Dolores i only hope that Almighty God will intervene for her and bring this priest to justice bcos we all know that the catholic church is very notorious for covering up for their preists in cases like this. We hear it all the time on CNN and BBC.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 05:57 pm, writes:
Its only a 'dunce' that would thnk "men of God" can see no evil and do no evil. In fact the very mindset betrays an ignorance that forms one of the basis of the oppression and repressions of Africans by fellow Africans and by people of other races. Africans are given to ascribing virtues to elders, peronalities and religious leaders wihtout prior proof that such an individual deserved that by their lifestyles whether in public or in private. The guys here trumpeting the virtues of a Richard Burke (i dont know him) betray the African disease of listlessly and mindlessly singing about what they do not know. we sing about people in leadership to the high heavens especially if they have been our benefactors in one way or the other. we are more concerned about ourselves rather than do things that may make the case for the common good. why are we like this? I am a pentecostal minister and i have heard and have known ministers who have not only fallen into sex sins but who also have remained perpetually involved with other women to whom they have not been married. so what makes a catholic priest different? is it because he wears white? And when will you get your proof that the priest may be guilty? when he sleeps with your mother? or with your sister or daughter? We all know that immoral sex acts are not done in public. so its always a case of your word against his.This woman says she has taped evidences of the words of this man recounting his escapades with even married women. My problem is not only with this case but with the way we africans think. this has over time become the basis of our fundamental dificulties as a race and as our diffenrent nationalities. we dont think! we have a mind but we hardly use it. Maybe if you just waited a while and think you may just by some little-tiny-whimpy chance realize that men of God are 'men' first before they are 'of God'. Just three letter words...MAN OF GOD. so he is still a man and he can be used of the devil just like other men are atimes or even at all times. The other day bill clinton claimed to have seen no evil and done no evil, but when investigations were done he came back begging for forgiveness.I believed him then and i eagerly hoped all miss Lewinsky had to say was just 'trash', because i really liked Mr Clinton (and i still do).But the end he admitted to having "an inapproriate relationship" with miss lewinsky A man inAustria camped his own daughter in the basement of his own house and made her into a sex-slave for some 16 years plus. she eventually had 4 children for by him. Abeg my brother and sister...lets start opening our minds up. Let us start using our minds. Maybe Richard Burke will still come back asking for forgiveness (that is if he ever repents) when he does Im sure it would be without prior consultation with his 'trumpeters'. And what will you then do? Please lets start using our minds and lets start knowing that in this present world...ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE....including the ones you dont want to hear!
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 06:00 pm, Nick writes:
the riddle is getting clearer. the wicked shall not go un punished. we are beginning the unravel the plot. the one who was looking for means to get a pound of flesh thus masterminded this report. know that the rot of God which has been upon you for your evil shall spread to members of your family for such an acusation against a holy man of God. The Archbishop has made effort in living a Holy life. your ambition failed you thus you sort a way of vengence. your phone calls to promote the news, your jubilations are well spelt out. its an unfortunate situation that your continued your evil plots to this level.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 06:02 pm, Dele writes:
THE COMMENT IMMEDIATELY ABOVE WAS WRITTEN BY ME DELE FROM ABUJA, NIGERIA
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 06:11 pm, Dele, Abuja nigeria writes:
Mr Nick or is it Miss Nick whatever you are and whoever you are...ask Burke, "how much did this woman demand of you before making the story public"? or what do you think she stands to gain by exposing you"? you (Nick)have reduced human beings to animals. even animals have a conscience. And i want to let you know that its not everything an individual does that have some 'plot' behind it...sometimes you do things by the obligations of your conscience. Thats fundamental to human beings...i mean real human beings.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 06:25 pm, Nick, Warri writes:
thank you Dele. we may say we do not know every action of a person but from evidence this man is not what was painted in the account given by this lady. let her present more facts. you cannot from abuja which is about 600 km from warri aplaud the story of this lady.
On Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 06:34 pm, writes:
if mr. Clinton admitted it is because he was guilty. should a man admit being guilty of what he has no idea of. in recent times this lady has been visited by an ambitious man who has failed in his ambition. if she says her sister was involved let her provide details so that her sister can testify. if she says hundred of nigerian girls let her state other even two will be sufficient. she said she was admitted in a hospital where the event took place, provide details of the hospital let us go and check the records if anyone like her was admitted during that period. it is so amazing the evil continues to triumph to such a tempo. are we so irritated by the presence of the rightous that we plot to kill them just the way the life of the prophet Jerimiah was threatened? this message was first published by This day news online under comment but when they scrutized it they probably thought it wise to remove it because of the incredulity of the assertions. it was then repeated hook, line and sinker here. it is definitely clear that the author has an agenda that is yer to be spelt out.
On Sunday, October 11, 2009 at 07:50 am, emmenuel from benin writes:
some of you amazed me on how you think! those of you suporting the bishop are doing so based on who he is to you and how you've known and see him.which is entirely not wrong.but pause for a while and rethink.why will a woman doing well in canada with a good family want to do a thing like this?that's because she has learnt over the years that what we see as nothing in nigeria is incredibly a cruel,wicked,damaging,stimagizing and punishable offence.the effect it has on the victims sometimes makes them unable to come out and expose him.first of all how many of our women have the proper education about abuse or being taken advantage of?those of you suporting him, what if it were your sister or mum?would you have allowed someone to provide the evidence or would you have allowed them to come out publicly expecially in front of your dad,classmates,family etc?even you would'nt want that as an african and that is the stigma and shame that is also extended to you who is not the primary victim and the advantage the bishop is taking because he knows it will be difficult for these people to come out.i just hope non of these people are your fiancees,or loved ones,then you will learn to to trust people by their looks or religous positions.i was i manservant i have seen what this priest can do to ladies.its so sad that people who they have been nice to will never want to beleive a thing like this.Nick,Dele doesn't have to be in warri before he knows.what if he was once there and he witnessed it?those of you who are closer see less than those who are far away.where you with him in agbarho or new jersey or in benin or even in ireland?how about the priest in ireland and other parts of the uk who abused 32,000 teenagers?how about the bishop in canada that was recently caught in the airport importing ponography and doing prostisution trade with people in cambodia,thailand and other developing country?this same bishop was reported 20yrs ago when he was still a priest and nobody did anything about it.they even went as far as to make him a bishop.now what goes around comes around.God is just exposing them and no one can stop God.hide the truth,bend the truth,twist the truth but it always have its way of finding itself! you all we see beyound every reasonable doubt that this lady is right atleast to some extent and you shall know that the Lord alone is the only true and righteous Judge! this bad priest are stigmatizing the good ones.when they try to oppose them,they'll be tyransfered to remote area and be threatened.giving bad names to the church of God.what a shame!
On Monday, October 12, 2009 at 07:44 am, writes:
@Nick...I may be 600kilometers from Warri, but its so easy for me to applaud the story of this lady BECAUSE I HAVE HEARD THE RECORDED TAPES WHERE BISHOP BURKE ADMITTED TO THESE OFFENCES AND APOLOGISED TO HER PROFUSELY ABOUT THESE CRIMES. The sad thing is you havent heard these tapes yourself. Really it would have been just ok if he had apologised all the way, but to apologise to her and then deny all of these to other people is intolerable!
On Monday, October 12, 2009 at 08:02 am, Ifeoma, Ibadan writes:
Dolores, I do not know what you stand to gain by this publication, remember Jesus words "Touch not my annointed and do my prophet no harm " Do have a re-think, may God forgive you!!!
On Monday, October 12, 2009 at 12:44 pm, writes:
Dear ifeoma,since you decided to go with the bible,so be it. The book of Ephentian chapter 5 ,verse 10 to 14 says "Try to learn what pleases the Lord. Have nothing to do with the worthless things that people do, things that belong to the darkness. Instead ,bring them out to the light.{it is really too shameful even to talk about the things they do in secret.} And when all things are brought out to the light,then their true nature is clearly revealed; for anything that is clearly revealed becomes light. That is why it is said ,"wake up sleeper,and rise from death and christ will shine on you." Someone have said they have listen to the tapes and I too have done the same. it is very said and depressing for me to know that archbishop richard burke have done and commited such a crime and not resign. What can of a gospel is he preaching? Africa is going to be the next place that God is going to face with this sex abuse by priest. Ifeoma, God himself said "my judgement will began in my own house" Touch not my anionted is for good chilren of God. archbishop richard burke cannot be anointed and at the same time sextually involve with vonurable young girls who hardly can eat once a day. that contradict the word or God. We all have to be careful what we say. This lady have done what most of us can not do. May the good lord bless her. Everone is normal, until you get to know them. It is a sad day for the church. Dolores ,you did a good job coming out to expose this shameleess Richard Burke. I hope they dont send him back to nigeria. Even lied to his fellow prisrt that he is going for treatment. he is also a lier. wolf in sheep clothing.
On Monday, October 12, 2009 at 02:17 pm, writes:
"In Gemany they came first for the communists and I didnt speak up,because i wasnt a communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didnt speak up,because I wasnt a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionist and I didnt speak up,because i wasnt a trade unionist. Then they came for the protestants and I didnt speak up,because I am a catholic. Then they came for me and by that time ,no one was left to speak up." Do you have to be abuse first for you to belief that ARCHBISHOP RICHARD BURKE , AN IRISH, ABUSE THIS LADY?
On Monday, October 12, 2009 at 04:46 pm, Lynda writes:
What did our Lord Jesus Christ say to the Pharisees who wanted to stone the adulterous woman, He said he who is without sin should be the first to cast the stone at her, they all dropped their stones and walked away. We all are sinners before God, and none is free, so whatever anyone has done, he or she does not deserve a public condemnation, but we need to pray that the grace of God may abound in all of us to enable do His will always. May the name of the Lord be praised both now and forever more. Amen.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 02:18 pm, Eddy, Warri writes:
Thanks Mr. Emmanuel from Benin. its an unfortunate thing that all effort mounted to prevent him from assuming the seat of the archbishop ofBenin proved abortive but resulting to such a step ... is more unfortunate for Benin. it is beyond being malicious.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2009 at 02:31 pm, Odiri writes:
Emmanuel well done for your comment. You have reasoned finely. But it is clear from your opening statement that you are yet to proceed beyond the boundaries of Edo state. I even wonder if you have moved as much as ekpoma or maybe you stopped at Ehor thinking you have entered ishan. You think paupers are not in canada? hic ... find out the reson many people who travel abroad refuse to return home for even a visit after 10 years. some cant afford a ticket, others have nothing to show for wasted time while their mates who endured the difficulties of the system here have either cars or houses as a reward. fame is a desire of many abroad. it makes them feel like celebrities. Dont be suprise, there is a lot the woman tends to gain from all this. Nick, I appreciate your comment.
On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 08:14 am, Joseph, Warri. writes:
I have personally met a lady who has confided in me on this kind of issue about this same bishop. I will speak with her again and make her understand she must come out to talk. I am amazed at people when they speak as if it is impossible for this kind of act to happen. We have seen in the news before where people have to defend men of God for acts like this only for such men of God coming out at the end to admit their crime. For those who are in doubt,please i`d advise you to sit, wait and see. Don`t defend what you don`t know. I will advise the victim of this act that i know, to use this forum at the minimum to tell you her story. I am proud to be a catholic but i am ashamed of acts like this. Dolores,i dont know you but based on the evidence that i have about a victim,i believe you. Please fight on and people like me are behind you. And if the bishop dedides to be a hardened sinner and refuse to confess and repent,we all know what will befall him,the bible is not ambiguous about it.
On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 12:09 pm, Oke writes:
Please those believing the story of the lady should ask themselves what is thier interest and what do they stand to gain? From the argument of those who support the woman, it is clear that is a plot because of the strength of your argueent and hatred for the archbishop. This is amazingly disappointing. How can u condemn a man you have not seen or lived with? Please stop this nonsense and face your lives. if the arcbishop is guilty, leave that to God. Dnt play God\'s role and be a judge. if he is not guitly, you should also leave it to God. Which person among those supporting this woman has not committed sin before. Pleasse use your time to pray for the growth of church, insstead of being an agent of the devil destroying the church. let us mind our business and leave this matter for those who are hanling it, while we pray for the church. Please stop playing God on this matter.
On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 12:18 pm, JANE writes:
Thank you Oke. Let us leave this issue alone. We are fighting ourselves here over an issue that we barely know so much about. Like Oke said, we should leave this whole thing to God. Soe people are acting as if they are paid to destroy the archbishop. What are you going to profit. Some of you speak in a manner you will not even speak about your enemy. Please give some credit to the archbishop. Do not be disrespectful to him and speak in manner that is not right. A good christian will only pray at such a time like this. let us pray instead of trading words right here.
On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 at 12:19 pm, JANE writes:
Thank you Oke. Let us leave this issue alone. We are fighting ourselves here over an issue that we barely know so much about. Like Oke said, we should leave this whole thing to God. Soe people are acting as if they are paid to destroy the archbishop. What are you going to profit. Some of you speak in a manner you will not even speak about your enemy. Please give some credit to the archbishop. Do not be disrespectful to him and speak in manner that is not right. A good christian will only pray at such a time like this. let us pray instead of trading words right here.
On Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 05:34 pm, nichol, from kenya writes:
All of u are mumus,I mean fools and i mean all of u who are supporting richard burke and those against him.Judge ur lives.Face ur lives.Remember the one u did the other day,.is it bcos no body is saying it?Are ur hands clean?God knows his people
On Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 06:48 pm, johnson writes:
Things are not often as they appear. but let he who is without sin be the first to cast the stone. time, time is a sincere judge. but let those who know nothing be quiet and those who claim to have listened to a tape. let them tell us where to find it.
On Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 07:39 pm, writes:
Are you the bossman johnson? May God help you. We are trying to locate you. Open your eyes. I wish you Gods help in life.
On Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 08:49 pm, priscal,nigeria benin city writes:
i have carefully followed the aligation of Dolores Atwood and other rational contributions from different individuals from different part of the world.my contribution is going to come from a different angle.it could be true that our bishop did exactly what this woman is saying and it could never be false that he did not do it.my argument for saying the above is based on my personal experience with some priests.,89%of our priest sleep with women more than married men,so many of our young girls today are been dis-virgin by our catholic priest most especially when this young girls go to church for one spiritual activities or the others.as am writing now so many girls are in the priest rooms doing what?some who entered this sexual relationship very early find it very difficult to let go because all her want are meet.i wish to wake all young and old women who must have suffered what Dolores Atwood suffered stand up and do same,come out with facts.doing so, we are helping our priest to keep to their vows,an protecting our unborn child from such sacrilege.
On Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 09:16 pm, jude benin city writes:
your Grace,i know you must have been felling bad about this issue,well THAT is life for you.if what the woman said is true beg God for forgiveness and apologies to the lady.but if it\'s untrue,take as your cross and beg GOD to forgive her.above all advice your priests there own may be worse.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 06:37 am, Okemutie,Benin. writes:
Let everyone who reads and hears about this restrains his or herself. Only God knows the truth.Mere conjecture will not help,neither the proponents or the opponents. In all,let us not jugde,rather,we should pray for the parties involved.Even if it is true,we all should learn to temper justice with mercy afterall we are human and if you have never sinned both in private and public keep casting the stone...only God will save us all.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 06:48 am, Ogbemudia Otas,Benin City writes:
May God have mercy on us. Difficult times are bound to come.No one should support wrong doing of anykind.All should be careful while we condemn the Archbishop even before he is given the chance to defend himself.Dolores,please take things easy,you may the correct but there are other enemies of the Catholics priesthood who may want to exploit the situation.I am praying for you and the whole church whose good name will be highly injured by these varied comments.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 06:57 am, Franka writes:
What is you people's argurement? If actually the archbishop is guilty, did he commit the sin alone? so why should he appologise to a lady that is an ingrate, after she has enjoyed all the goodies associated with being close to an archbishop, she can now open her mouth wide to talk against the archbishop. I have no doubt that it was through the connection of the archbishop that she met her Canadian husband - what an ingrate!!! What is our christian life all about if not for prayer, forgiveness and reconcilliation - I think it is high time we stopped all comments on this same issue, it is not glorifying God.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 07:06 am, Abigail,NY writes:
An awesome tail,isnt it? This is a funny shit.Its no good to blackmail the entire church.I am some sure there are still good pastors all over the world.It happens here quite often and people get huge pay packets.Guys pray for your priests,they are in real danger men.I am no priest,I don even go to church but this whole shit is worrysome you know.
On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 08:39 am, ONOME,WARRI. writes:
Franka! I am sure if you have the opportunity to sleep with the "BISHOP" for the so called gooooodies,you will. It is clear from your statement. I am sorry for you. Anyway,if Dolores got her connection through the "BISHOP",please kindly look for one bishop in your area for your own connection. I am ashamed of your comment...
On Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 06:11 am, IrishCanonlawyerPriester writes:
This is in deed sad. But no one should doubt these events. If anyone has been following events the news in Ireland the church is paying dearly now for past abuses in children homes, for emotional and physical abuse. News, of the Paraguay bishop, now President of that country who impregnated a young woman, and whom he began to sleep with as minor, the case of archbishop Pius Ncube of Bulawayo, and rumours regarding the unsuccessful sexual harrassment and intended molestation of a Nigerian nun, Paschaline Aligweke by a former Bishop of Okigwe; and including known rumours related to the current archbishop of Nigeria, Abuja, John Onaiyekan and Nigerian nuns must all give us goose bumps but not to deny these stories. Let Burke resign. Let him come out to disprove this woman. This woman a moslem convert, has so much personal details of this man that the burden is now more on Bishop Burke to disprove these allegations. What if this woman's sister comes out publicly? People think. Yes, the church is of God, but it is human beings made of flesh and blood that are in it. People do make mistakes. If married people with one wife cannot stay with their one wife and look around, we know how hard it can be for a priest without one. Yes, there are some cold days too and we all feel this. But the issue is that this kind of pattern of exploitation must be investigated. If the St. Patrick's fathers have any shame at all, they must conduct a transparent investigation and notify the Vatican immediately about what they are hearing. My hunch is that since this is a third world country, where the legal system is not well developed to accomodate those needs, they would play some games. But I bet given that this woman is now located in Canada, if she is able to prove her case beyond any reasonable doubt, the Bishop Burke, should be angling for trouble. More so, the woman should contact the diocese in New Jersey where Burke worked to see if there is any pattern there too, once a U.S. link can evolve then they can do a class action case or individual case, with one acting as witnesses. These allegations if credible would truly incriminate the Bishop Burke. I know a lot of Irish priests and bishops have women here, and some old missionaries transported this to Nigeria it seems. Remember the 1992 case of the former bishop of Galway, fathering a child with an American woman?
On Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 06:38 am, IrishCanonlawyerPriester writes:
I posted one above. However, following a quick web research on Dolores Atwoods, I found the following opinion that she wrote when Archbishop Milingo married in 2001. In a BBC June 11, 2001-"should Catholic Priests Marry?" Dolores, stated this- [Nobody is forced to be a priest. Anyone who is a priest, knows the rules before becoming one, that is why we have other churches. If you like to be a married minister, you can choose from the many other good churches out there. It doesn't have be the Catholic Church, it's all a matter of choice. Not everyone is called to marry. Is anything wrong if we have some few people in this world who want to dedicate their lives to the service of GOD? Those who choose to marry should do so like me, and those who choose to be a priest should remain so. Dolores Atwood, Nigerian living in Canada ] I wonder, how someone could write that favourable statement, and now turn around to go after another archbishop who may or may not have had an affairs. I am trying to put the legal puzzles together and see whether this make any sense. Dolores, if you still signed on please reply. YOur credibility is on the line, and should this go legally on-line your entire history would be somewhat put on display.
On Thursday, October 22, 2009 at 06:57 am, IrishCanonlawyerPriester writes:
If this is the same Dolores Atwood, she seems enterprising. But I wonder why it took her this long to come out- when in fact, she kept talking to the archbishop. Was her needs not met financially? was she in danger of divorce? was she in financial crises? In spite of all, she continued to be actively involved in her church, serving as lector and all that. I wonder whether this is typical of those abused? Is this a case of jealousy, thinking that the archbishop who is fond of her, is now closer also to her sister? was the archbishop been a good friend continuing to support her, and in her marriage? If the intention is not evil why did she make those tapes- in many places in North America, except for the government, tapes made without disclosure/consent of the other party are not tenable in court. Is this a publicity stunt? Delores needs to clear this questions for the sake of her integrity, especially as one who is interested in politics. I do hope that this is not all targeted toward making her promote her politics using church/priests' sex abuse as a scaffold to a brighter career? My job here is to ensure there is integrity and not just some dummy ass accusations against an innocent clergy, though the Catholic Church as I alerted prior has gotten lots of bad press.
66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
Atwood, Dolores CANDIDATE DETAILS Affiliation Liberal Name Dolores Atwood Address Yarmouth, Nova Scotia , Canada Email None Website None Born Unknown Died Still Living (2009 years) Contributor John Hodgman Last Modifed John Hodgman Jun 04, 2006 09:49am Tags Info Dolores Atwood is a very active, vocal and hard working community leader with a strong commitment in seeing Yarmouth grow. Since coming to Yarmouth in 1999, Dolores has served the community by sitting on the Town & Municipal Joint Heritage and Yarmouth Municipal Planning Advisory Committees. She has served as the President of the Business and Professional Women’s Club of Yarmouth and Nova Scotia and is actively involved with the local Women in Business initiative. She sits on the Board of Directors for the Yarmouth Arts Regional Center (Th’ YARC) and has joined the newly formed Immigration Initiatives Committee. Dolores is involved within the Church and serves as a lector at St. Ambrose Catholic Church. She has taught Sunday school at Our Lady Queen of Peace, Brooklyn and in the past has taught Catechism and Religious studies. Dolores is also active with the “After Five Club”, a non-denominational group that meet monthly. She was born in Ondo State Nigeria in 1969. She studied a bachelor in International Relations at Oba Femi Awolowo Federal University (OAU) from 1989 to 1993 and was the Vice President of the International Relations Student Association at OAU. She Immigrated to Canada in 1995 and married her husband Chris Atwood. From 1996 to 1998, Dolores was employed with the Government of Thailand as a community development coordinator. While in this position, she played a leading role in obtaining domestic and international funds to assist in the establishment of a Childcare Development Center in the Province of Phrae. After returning to Canada in 1998, Dolores served as the Nova Scotia representative on the CUSO (Canadian University Services Overseas) Atlantic Council. Dolores is a mother of 3 school age children and has worked as a teacher’s aid at the Port Maitland Elementary School. She has been a Board member of Parents Place and is presently involved with the Meadow Fields Home and School Association. In 2004 Dolores’ concerns over the challenges and issues facing local schools prompted her to run for a position on the Tri-County School Board. During this close race, Dolores had the opportunity to talk to many people living in the Municipality of Yarmouth and to discuss the challenges that are being faced not only in Education but also in regards to Health and Economic growth. Dolores believes that Yarmouth’s strength is its people and their resilience and determination to progress. Dolores has proven her commitment and desire to work and serve her community of Yarmouth and has shown, time and time again, the leadership and vision that Yarmouth needs to progress
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 02:31 pm, Nick writes:
Thank you very much, irishcanonlawyerpriester! it's clear there are many things yet unspoken in this whole case. Archbishop Burke had no problem until he got to a land where he was not welcomed. benin wanted their son ( indigene ) to become the archbishop and seat on the throne. It appears that it is this hatred that is further spearheaded and has been hatched in this case. From warri, it is clear that the archbishop is a holy man of God. both catholics and non-catholics as well as christians and non-christians testify to this. may God protect his servants from the plans of the evil one.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 03:32 pm, paul writes:
It is very sad to hear that another priest from ireland is pretending to be aan irishcanonlawyer to cause more pain to the christian community. If this man has coomitted this crime in ireland , he will be in prison by now. Why will a pretend priest say he is a irishcanonlawyer who do exatly the same thing as his friend richard burke go and search on this lady as if she is the one who abuse children? ARCHBISHOP RICARD BURKE commit a crime and you are going after the victim? SHAME ON YOU.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 03:34 pm, helen writes:
Irishcanonlawyer my foot and SHAME ON YOU AND RICHARD BURKE,both of you are child abusers.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 03:49 pm, Abidal writes:
Personally, I did contacted this lady,because I wanted to know the truth. I first wrote in this forum, and I was among those who critised her, But from all I have been hearing out there that is a devoted catholic that have brought convert to the church, that included her moslim family, and again what surprises me again from what I heard, that she is a very honest and compationate person, so I decided to make contant with her and hear her own story and the tapes she hear. She was indeed what they say she is. Very frank and straight forward. I asked her about the tapes. She said wait a minete and returned back with it and I listen to it. My jaw drop. Dele was right when he wrote from above that he hadf heard the takes. I felt bad ,because of all that I have said about this lady. may God forgive me . I thought the bishop was innocent, in fact we all own this lady an apology. Why should a lady who is happy married and doing very well want lie. She is telling the truth. Archbishop richard burke. you have wrong this lay ,,please resign and get help. You have missled us all. I am a proud catholic, but I am ashame end of you abuse and how you have divided our church. I am very soory miss dolores Atwood. Please keep up the fight.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 05:46 pm, irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
Some of you herein are just have small minds. In my first post, I have made the point that this abuse is intolerable and sympathized with Dolores Atwoods. I do not know what it is and how it works in the courts in Nigeria, but in the west, the personality, character, outward and gestured demeanours and other personal aspects are focused and scrutinized to provide a clear picture of the parties, offer the jury and opportunity to contemplate upon the crime to reach a definitive decision. The law must scrutinize both parties decisively and thorougly. My point in researching Dolores is to point out that she is real. Her achievements speak for her. However, she has not made a clear case beyond using the tools of the internet to vilify archbishop Burke. Here are my reasons. Dolores feels strongly about the Catholic priesthood and their celibacy. At the time she was writing (2001), she felt she was already violated and still was a strong advocate for a celibate priesthood. She continues to be active in her Catholic faith, which is laudable, in spite of the acclaimed abuses she had experienced, without feeling betrayed and hurt. The criminal justice system does work in looking at the whole picture. Allegations are easy to make. Motives can be everything and this is what in litigation every sound lawyers would be driving at. That, in fact, does not exonerate archbishop Burke, my country man and fellow priest. It only states that the structure of the legal system may not work to Dolores advantages. Both Dolores and Archbishop Burke have all erred enormously, in ways that legally complexify the so-called crimes. Lets take a peep into the reason. First, for Dolores. Dolores, even after she got married was still infactuated with the archbishop in a long distance relationship. She seemed to have continued the relationship from day, and thereafter, knowing as she alleged that this man was having affairs with other women. The simple legal test is: why did she choose to remain in the relationship, and for that long? Why was this relationship with an abuser not feel damaging. For archbishop Burke, here is his fault. Even, if she truly cared for this woman and her ordeals, he should have stopped conversing with her, and put an instant stop to the relationship; more so knowing that she was already married and with children. Further, he had no business, if Dolores facts are correct of continuing to discuss with her husband. They were already dealing with a lot, and he was still not leaving the scene. Now, I do not know how Nigerians see issues but here are my opinions. Most Nigerians are very narrow minded in their selected preferences and biases. Those who decry archbishop Burke and siding with Dolores, and those pro-Burke and anti-Dolores. Most are not ready to scrutinize this issue thoroughly. Most are hearing just one version and they are ready to take side. That is not how the criminal justice system work, especially the English Common Law that I suppose frame most of Nigerian legal practices and systems. More fundamentally, there are legal issues here too of whether, even if Delores is credible, the statutes of limitations have expired in this case. Further, what legal jurisdiction does she intend to utilize, Nigerian, Canadian, Irish, Roman, and what kind criminal, civic, canon law? It is not a straight answer here. My hunch is that Dolores would be unable to legally outwit the archbishop given some of these topical and complex problems. In Nigeria, the scene where the supposed crime(s) occurred, even if the statute of limitation has not expired,my impression is that it would be difficult to win due to the institutional constraints, Nigerians religiosity, the trauma of isolation and shame (cultural factors in that society) etc. It would also be long as Nigerian judicial systems are often clogged and takes long number of years to adjudicate on pending cases. I do not think that if no crime is committed in either Canada or Ireland (Burke's country of origin), that she can sue there. Her most viable option is that if she contacts the diocese where Burke worked in New Jersey and someone surface, she can acting as that person witness, and in the event that person win her case, use that to her legal advantage. Even this is doubtful given that she is not an American resident. I know how painful abuses are, and scrippling and damaging. But to also be fair to archbishop Burke, could it be stated that following immigration, and under the direct influence of some fake psychologists, they induced Delores to recall memories that lead to such framing, and without basis? This do happen at times, and of course many families have been damaged as a result of psychologists' insinuations that are not true in reality but rather induced. But again, is Dolores mad because her sister was also close to Burke, is this a case of sibling jealousy and rivalry, and fight for relevance, benefits and accruing privileges? Does she feel sidelined and despised? Fundamentally, where is Dolores sister, is she on her side? Is she talking? Is she ready to take the stand in a legal tussle against Burke and in favour of her sister? Dolores story would be more credible if more people come out and are able to prove beyond all means and reasonable doubt that Burke also violated them. All of these beg for thorough understanding and scrutiny. Having done an attempt to present these issues, as Nick herein raised, there are a lot of other motives that can be at work here. The case of Warri diocese and Benin archdiocese, where there was a tussle for the bishop's office may be a motive here. Is anyone using the closeness of a disgrunted Dolores (suspecting her sister is sleeping around with her best lover) to try to supplant Burke? We may never know. But the fact that Dolores also selected to fight her fight on the internet, shows she has limited access or even valued confidence that her case would make it through the judicial system(s). It shows some desperation. More so, she was using an opinon segment of a major Catholic newspaper, such intent shows malice, including desperation. That is not far fetched. Abuse of any kind must be decried. But even as an adult, and for many years Dolores did not put herself in a good position as she was very much enthuses with Burke. Burke also acted poorly, in a way that makes me doubt the competency of his judgement as a bishop of a major archdiocese in Nigeria. Abidal issue about a woman who is happily married with kids, sound very naive? Don't married people with children have motives, poor judgements, and also low self-esteemed? Such arguments are in deed porous and devoid of critical sense as an instrumentation in pursuing legal liability. How do we even know that this woman is happily married? If she was happily married she would not be contacting a bishop, who did not want her married to her husband in the first place, as she recounts. As Irish and a Priest, I might be biased, but I have shared this facts because I believe any and all unwarranted, non-mutual abuses are demeaning and damaging. Consentual and mutual affairs, even if they are in poor tastes, happening between adults are a different matter. I have put myself against the church in pointing out against what I perceive as archbishop Burke's actions, and have even called on him to resign if these events are factual.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 09:01 pm, prisca writes:
You are obviously not a spiritual priest and a friend to richaid burke ,because of the way you discribed the nigerian people and that you are very insencitive of others and you just generalise,because you are not hearing or like what people are saying about richard burke. I do not believe that there is a motive behind this. I think you are trying to discourage dolores from pursuing this case. You mention about culture factor and isolation and shame, shows that richard knows and took advantage of it. Well you cannot distroy the truth.I believe that this lady is strong and I think this issue is going to be bigger than we think. Alot of people here are behind this lady and I heard that she is already have people calling her for support. She has a very good reputation, judging from those who went to school with her and well respected at her university and very smart too and you can not even find any wrong even when you search.I believe that richard burke abuse this lady at 14th. A lady who went to a forign counties and have acheive all this in a short period of time, shows she is responsible. Her life and who she is spoke of her. she loves her family and everyone knows that.By the way,a priest did something teribly wrong to my family, but we never left the church. He left eventually. Richard burke must have groom this lady , i know it is all phychological that he keep communicating with her shows that he has been afriad of this lady exposing him for a long time and manupulating her and that is why the communication ,not that she was having a sextual relationship with him.. You will be surprise how she will fight back.
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 10:50 pm, Angela writes:
Fr patrick, I heard you were booted out of nigeria in relation to all this, and that you have a good knowledge of what richard burke was doing and you were also invoved. No more free women, driver and the warm sun weather,? now you are cold and wish you are back in nigeria. Sorr.Thank you cadinal olubummy
On Friday, October 23, 2009 at 11:51 pm, Seeker of Justice and Truth writes:
I am writing this note in response to irishcannonlawyerpriest. Though you have made some valid points, you have also been somewhat biased and skewed in your “legal” opinions and you have also made some very reckless assumptions, if you are writing your comments from a truly neutral and uninfluenced position. In an earlier statement you have said that “tapes made without disclosure/consent of the other party are not tenable in court”, this is not necessarily true, in fact, taped conversations are OFTEN used as evidence and are examined with the same lens as letters and other documents in criminal law. I would suggest that you hit your law books Fr. P.C.. Secondly, you make a dangerous assumption, if you are truly commenting as an observer of this blog. You have google searched Dolores Atwood and have pasted her bio and comments from a BBC site. Canada is a country of more than 30 million people, how are you sure that the info that you have inserted is that of the “Dolores Atwood” making the complaint against Richard Burke? If you do not have intimate knowledge of this, you, as a lawyer have opened yourself up to a number of serious allegations! I will base the rest of what I write on your assumptions. In your “unbiased” statement on Dolores’ faith you question how could someone who was abused remain active and involved in the Church? I know that you are playing the “devils advocate” and for those other gentle readers of this site, I would propose; There are many people who have been abused at a young age by religious people and remain actively involved in the Church and do not disclose their abuse because of the shame and guilt that they feel. It is often not until they are much older when they disclose the abuse. Some people who are abused as youngsters become abusive when they get older. Who is not to say, that Richard Burke was not abused by a Saint Augustan Brother when he was attending school and that his abusive sociopathic tendencies are not a result of this? We must also delve more seriously into the allegation of the abuse and when the abuse started. Dolores states that she was 14 years old and that her parents were separating. For a young girl this must have been traumatic. She was looking for counseling and for someone to listen to her. Richard Burke, at the same time would have been… 35 years old! Do I need to draw a picture? A 35 year old white man, who is in a position of power and a vulnerable 14 year old Nigerian girl (wake up!). Now, let us look at Dolores’ youngest sister. I will assume that she was 17 to 19 years of age when Richard molested her. We must now ask again, how old was Richard? Was he 50 to 51 years of age? The though of such an old man with young women is revolting and disgusting as well as being illegal! Now let us look at culture. I will assume once again, that irishcannonlawyerpriest you have spent some time in Nigeria and are aware of some of the cultural “faupas” of that Country. You are then probably aware that if a man were to knowingly engage in sexual relationships with two sisters (same mother/same father) that that would be considered a Nigerian CULTURAL ABOMINATION! Gentle readers, could we not assume that this may have been the tipping point that made Dolores want to come forward? Now for a moment let us return back to the “relationship” that existed between Richard Burke and Dolores Atwood in most recent times. It is obvious, if we take Dolores’ account as being credible, as St Patrick’s Missionary Society has done, that Richard Burke often used manipulation and intimidation to perpetuation the relationship. Richard Burke, would tell Dolores that “if anyone found out about the relationship, that it would be bad for him and bad for the Church” he would also state “ If your husband found out about this he will surely divorce you and take the children”. Imagine, a woman living in a foreign country, without any relatives and hearing such threats, do you not think that she would be afraid to speak out? Richard Burke has shown very little regard towards Dolores or her sister. If we look at Richard Burke’s nature and the cycle of abuse that is obviously seen in evidence submitted, we start to see signs of a serial abuser with sociopathic tendencies. I would suggest that anyone who is not familial with the signs or profile of a sociopath go to this site: http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html . Irishcannonlawyerpriest, you have chosen to keep your identity a secret, that is your choice as it is mine. You have also chosen to play the “devils advocate” and to provide skewed “legal” opinions disguised as being objective, but clearly ignoring many of the allegations raised against the Archbishop by Dolores Atwood. As members of the Body of Christ, we have a responsibility to respect life and humanity and to ensure justice and peace for all within our Church. God’s Judgment will start in His Own House. We must look beyond our fraternities and remember our obligations to God and Jesus, or else, we are no better than the Pharisees and Sadducees of Old. Let us join to stop the abuse and heel the suffering.
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 04:16 pm, irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
Seekerofjustice and truth, I appreciate this response. Somehow, I think it is Dolores voice being articulated, but that does not make a difference. In my initial post here, I did sympathized enormously with Dolores' conditions, and I asked her to seek justice, even by contacting authorities in the New Jersey diocese that Burke worked. If allegations do surface there, there is a more likely and higher possibility of Dolores having her day in court, at least if not for herself but as a witness bringing attention to a critical issue. I do definitely understand abuse and I have enjoined options that may not be attuned to the thinking of the majority of Catholics, including authorities within my own church. You put it better, here was is been done is playing the "devil's advocate" and that is what the judicial system does to arrive at the facts. Emotional and physical abuses, which additional details seekerofjustice and truth has presented that is not within the original posting herein, offers more details- though it is this that makes me think, Dolores or any of her surrogate is the one posting. But no big deal.\ Surely, I did spend sometime in Nigeria for a number of years and traveled the world. The point I made about making tapes secretly is a general norm in the United States and Canadian legal system. I was trying to weight and measure, candidly the different trajectories open to Dolores to pursue her case, while also bringing to the fore the enormous challenges, including heightened additional emotional crises that would be generated during the litigation, especially trial scenario. These processes are cruel and painstaking. That is the bare truth. No one is saying that what the archbishop did, if it is true, is appropriate. But again, human life and affairs are not that simplistic, and the legal options, are not often as easy as many people sometimes think. It is draining and time consuming, it can be humiliating and strenuous on the psyche. That is my point precisely. However, Dolores' intents would be scrutinized. More so, the way I understand the current Nigerian legal system, there is no systematic framework in place to deal with some of these allegations, at least as I know it. I would conjecture that the bulk of the allegations did happen in Nigeria, and so this is where the judicial determination would naturally have to take place, except if Dolores can prove that some of this occurred while she was in Canada, in which case, she was then an adult. Given that she continued to engage the archbishop in endearing and amorous conversations may constitute a problem for validating even if such occurred that this was not a consentual relationship. Then, the bishop's lawyers can get him to agree it was consensual, and the best alternative recourse to Dolores, would then not be a criminal option, but a civil law suit. All, I was doing is playing out these entire scenario. For Dolores, as hard as these events are, her location in the west privileges her. But her motives would always continued to be questioned and suspect, even if she is telling the truth. The structures and systems of our human society respect institutions. It is taking societies like the United States, Canada, and now Ireland many years to come to terms with events that happened many decades ago. It is not often that easy. The issue is not about the veracity here, but more about after all these allegations, denting, and public revelation, what next for both Dolores and also for Burke. In everyway, through whatever lenses and angles, it is a sad occurence, because this is no game. These actions have ramifications for the lives of the individuals involved, their present, future, and probably both physical, mental, emotional, ethical, social, and spiritual wellbeing. How they are coping is something that one would imagine is hard, in everyway. No one, not myself privileges evil, but evil in spite of all good intents or goodwill do occur in human society. We also know that in today's world, if Burke was not a priest this would hardly even draw attention. Many men, not that it is good and to be encouraged, play this game all the time. If this was done by Dolores' secondary school teacher, in Warri, this would have largely not caught on. Yet, teachers like priests, are in position of authorities and respectability. This is what compounds the problem, because if not the image of the priest, many Nigerians and expatriates do molest and harrass women all the time, pregnant them, pass on diseases to them. As a church and society, what is been called for here, is the audacity to help to foment changes, in ways that we do not unduly violate the rights of anyone, including women, whether in the church or society. Few years ago, the Irish head of the worldwide Congregation of Medical Missionaries of Mary, documented the abuse of young and vulnerable, women, especially nuns by priests and some bishops. The situation of the Zimbabwean archbishop Pius Ncube is also well-known, even though that was a consensual case, in which he denied but confronted with visual images and other facts, he came clean by accepting and apologizing to his supporters. Of course, many were livid and felt he took advantage of their loyalty. Mind you, Ncube, was someone at the time that a section of Zimbabwean society, were trying to coopt to run as that country's President to hound Mugabe out of office. We know, this things do exist. The case of the President of Paraguay, which I alluded to, in my initial posting is a case in point. He fathered a child with a woman, whom he started dating as a minor, but he did apologized and came clean. Healing comes from acceptance, humility, apology, and the attempt to make amend. Finally, as to whether the internet research proved it was the same Dolores, that was not a definitive statement either- it was a suppositional position, that expressed "if it is the same...." It was not a settled and definitive bold assertion. I do agree that they might be many Dolores Atwoods in a country of 30 million people, but the probability that it might be the same Dolores Atwood is high given that correlation of many incidental facts- described or ascribed as a Nigerian living in Canada, or an immigrant from Nigeria resident in Canada, and as one who equally happen to be Catholic. All these correlates with identities that are claimed or resembles her posted profile relative to this case. Uppermost in my mind is the healing of those who are victims and have been abused. Even more significantly is the spiritual and emotional healing of both the victims and the alleged abuser. I am sorry, both as Irish and a priest, that this even emerged at all. One thing that comes also to the fore is that most times, many people tend to think the problem of celibacy or abuse is an African problem, within a racial ranking that consider Africans somewhat as less capable of living their celibate vows in some ecclesiastical quarters. As an Irish priest and missionary, it is now time for us to own up, that we might have wrongfully presented such notion of defective priestly lifestyle to the Africans we helped evangelized, creating a dichtomy between the "normative" and the "actuality" of priestly practice. We must own up that the issue of struggling with celibacy, and even abuse, is one that is not bounded by cultural or national markers. But overall, it helps us see that the Church too is human, made up of human beings struggling to be better. The image of the church that enthrones priests as angelic, incapable of acting as other humans, sets them up for trouble. I have seen many African priests think the hell of themselves as a kind of surrogate- God, and the people rank them that way. In fact, when I was a young missionary in Nigeria and Uganda, some Africans were surprised that a priest could eat ordinary food, use the restrooms, and so excluded them by virtue of religion from the order of ordinary people. This kind of rating has its consequences in the kind of action, Dolores and her sister claim to have suffered. Finally, the entire notion of escape, and using "coyotes" or conduits for immigration; the quest for a good westernized and materialized life, subjects many young African women to the wrong people- sexual predators, international sex rings, and dubious characters. Africans must begin to see their traditional values and environment as not as sad as presupposed, because such notions also embed the seed for exploitation and ripping off young women. I am not here to be callous. I go at length to respond to this because I am saddened by it all, and I know that it is a very complex situation. I wish God's healing for all those involved; that they may know that our God can do superfluously more than we can ever imagine in bringing his peace, healing, and joys even into the most broken realities and desperate of all human situations. I look forward to Dolores and her sister's healing, while I also beg the same, especially healing, conversion of heart, even for the alleged abuser. One cannot say, that incidence such as this totally eclipse some of the good acts both for the Church, Society, and persons carried out by archbishop Burke. He might need help, for which he had never hard. It is truly at times hard to be a priest- there is a limited room for venting, debriefing, and destressing, and so, without being apologetic for archbishop Burke's actions, asking for some benevolence of heart, since we cannot except for God know the full reasons or minds of any individuals. I seek justice for acts that they are responsible, liable, and culpable, but I also think that beyond revenge, beyond revealed truths, worthwhile as they may be, justice must lead ultimately to peace. The residue of hurt, hate, violence, and revenge can be a combustive detonator whose outbursts can only boost further hates, hurts, violence, low-self-exteem, revenge, and negativity. We all have all sinned and fallen short of God's glory, but we all are also equally created in the radiance of God's love, joy, and peace. We must not allow grievance to destroy us, and that I think it is the reason St. Paul states " Be angry, and do not sin: do not let the sun go down on your wrath, Nor give place to the devil...Let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, and all evil speaking be put away from, and with all malice. And be kind to one anotner, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you" (Eph. 4: 26-26, 31-32). It worthwhile that Dolores had adhered to the St. Paul (Eph. 4: 25)- "Let each one of you speak truth with his neighbor," for you are members of one another."
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 04:59 pm, prisca. writes:
You have forgeting the book of Eph5:5:10-14. You seems to attack this lady, for you it seems personal. I suggest you phone her or send her an e-mail and asked her these questions,why you who claim to be a priest not act as one. Go and call her. But you prefer to judge her her.You have not acted wisely and you seems to be a trouble maker and not happy that she is exposing what you believe in. Richard burke is a sociopath like seeker of truth and justice put it.,Richard burke ,patrick iriskcananonlawyerpries,why dont you phone her? The fact you did not contact her before coming to this forum as you critized her tell alot about you. You mentioned that the nigerians are narrowminded people and you a broad minded irish priest is complaining to narrowminded people, what does that say about you? Even the devil can quot the bible. You are out for this lady and that is why you met your match,seeker of truth and justice. This man did very well. I hope he does not waste his time with you. What happen to Nairaland, did you corrupt them too? But you cant with the catholic Report, USA base , patrick.
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 08:34 pm, irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
Prisca, You see what you want to see. You are opinionated and that is alright by me. If you think you know better, then go to the court of law. You are not helping this young woman, who seems to be exceedingly bright, but got into a situation that is not pleasant for her wellbeing and good coping. You language of vitrol is also very appalling. If you want to assist someone, you got to be honest and let them see the whole sides of the issue. Let's be frank, the jury of the internet or media cannot rectify this situation justly. Many people are hurt, and it is their pastoral wellbeing and their ability to once again ease their pains and help them be more fully human that is at stake- not just some showy concern. Every concern that is not genuine on the long run does not stand the rigorous tests of life's complexities. Insolence and verbiage solves no issue, at least not in the manner of your narrowmindedness.
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 09:09 pm, Seeker of Justice and Truth writes:
I need to “applaud”, my Brother in Christ, Irishcannonlawyerpriest in his ability to transform from “apt” legal advisor to “spiritual” councilor & cleric. Again, you have made many valid points. Given the current discussion, we must take what we have presented before us as stated above as fact. I must speak to the need for healing, which is the theme of Irishcannonlawyerpriest discussion. However, before we begin the journey of healing, we will need complete disclosure. Given the facts that have been presented, Richard Burke himself needs to come forward (as opposed to hiding in the Church) and confess his wrongs, not only to Dolores, who is the principal of this complaint, but to all those that have been hurt and victimized by his self-indulgences and seemingly unquenchable lust of the flesh. This includes his other victims, the parishioners of the Churches that he has served, The SPS, the Catholic Church at large, his family and in fact, the whole nation of Ireland, for which he represents when serving abroad. Given the facts that have been presented before us, we can only conclude that Richard Burke’s current situation is solely of his own making. If in 1982 when he first met Dolores and if he had done his JOB as a priest, which was to provide spiritual and emotional support and counsel, none of this would be coming out today. Irishcannonlawyerpriest is again correct, that the attention that this topic is being given is because of the rank that Archbishop Richard Burke has attained within the Church. Again, was it not Richard Burkes’ ambitious nature that brought him to his current position? It is true that this would most likely not be getting the same level of attention if the abuser had been a teacher, doctor or other professional. However, in stating that, if the abuser had been a teacher, doctor or other professional, that individual would have had their professional credentials and or licenses stripped and they themselves would have been removed from their practices immediately once the allegation was made. This would have been done long before the courts would have had an opportunity to review the facts and allegations. This leads to another very disturbing fact of this case. We know, that a written complaint was made to the Church back in March 2008, and we can only suspect that the allegations against Richard Burke were probably made verbally even earlier than that. Why then, was Richard Burke allowed to stay in Ministry and in Nigeria until July 2009? Negligence in these matters are not an excuse for the Church, given that the Church has adopted strict policies and procedures to address sexual abuse allegations. I fear that the Church’s neglect in this matter may once again cost the Church much embarrassment. This is very sad, especially when we examine the process that Dolores Atwood began. It is apparent, from the facts that we have before us, that Dolores Atwood felt that by coming forward to the Church with her complaint, that the Church would be willing and able to address this grave and serious matter. The Church, as it has done so often in the past chose to play the game known as “pass the buck” in the hopes that the situation would just go away. As I stated in my earlier comments, we, the people that represent the Body of Christ need to look beyond our fraternal obligations and return to the fundamentals of our faith, which was bought by the Blood of Christ. Instead of trying to “demonize” the victims in cases such as these, we need to embrace them, not with hollow words of “ We are sorry” but with strong actions against offenders. Let us not forget what the Catholic Church is, which is the “Universal” Church of God. It should not be up to the worldly courts of the nations to teach us morality. It should be our responsibility to teach the world a higher standard of morality through living our lives as our Savior Jesus Christ taught us. “More is expected to whom more is given”! We must not forget that our faith teaches us, that at the end of our days there is only one true court and that is the Court of The All Mighty, and His judgment of each one of us will be both true and just. Are you prepared for The Judgment?
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 09:33 pm, prisca writes:
You are not a very serious person, you are curnny . you intentionally came to this forum to insult this innocent lady who have done the right thing to speak out,you dont like it and that was confirmed by the seeker of justice and truth. You have a temper and I can tell from the way you write. Yourself and richard have been invoved in this seek and hide game or sick game for many years until you were inplicated yourself and you were booted out. You call yourself a priest with a bad temper. Please stay in your ireland, no body need you were narrowminded people live. you are lucky that for now ,you got away because those village girls are not knowledgeable enough to put you away,but one day you will be caught, that is why you can open your mouth without shame to say what you are saying. You just quot the bible some few time ago and now you are calling me narrowminded person,you are a shame to your st patrick congregation,you abandon priest. you are a bitter man. If ARCHBISHOP RICHARD BURKE have any shame as some as a needle eye, he will resign and if you have any shame yourself you will stop communicating in this forum patrick.
On Saturday, October 24, 2009 at 09:42 pm, prisca writes:
Are you bright,? you are not.Yes , Dolores Atwood is very bright,we all know that, and that is why richard burke was exposed. She was 14 ,richard burke was 35years, .Tell me,who should know better. She is not in a mess. How many qualify canonlawyers do you know or heard that put themselves to this low? The good priest are all behind this lady and praying for her and you are here attacking her and myself, because we are not saying what you want to hear.
On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 09:48 am, David writes:
I ran out of reading as after ten posts the brain wash was affecting me.Thankfully the last post has come down from the clouds. I have met these type of power hungry monsters and their double act is quite amazing, mostly from show biz but quite a number of priests in mIreland.
On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 01:42 pm, irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
The best response to this issue has been the one that seekerofjusticeandtruth has presented. That says it all. The kind of verbiage by folks like Prisca, would only end up diminishing the significance of this behaviour, which I have counted as appalling, distateful, and had in my first posting called for certain lines of actions such as Dolores to contact the church in New Jersey to see if she could come up with some additional supportive facts, and had equivocally called for Archbishop Burke to resign. Folks like Prisca and her tribe are just so eaten up by their gut feelings, without looking at the entire facts of this matter. That does not help. Healing occurs at many level for individuals and communities. I do agree that a public confession and acceptance of responsibility is essential here. Archbishop Burke cannot continue to hide within the canopy of prestige and privilege to scuttle this. His reaction, I agree is a kind of trying to buy time, so that the passage of time would let this go into oblivion. I also agree that the St. Patrick's fathers must also respond to this serious allegations. I am afraid that being afraid of their culpability they are scare of the consequences of litigation. It is in this that I agree, that while the church is Holy, and also imperfect in its human constitution, that it must live above board and act honestly. The church must, as seekerofjusticeandtruth has stated be more than the rest of society, offering prime examples of accountability and responsibility. I must also state that we must not be gullible here too. Priests are human beings, with all the characteristics that accrue to all humans, which includes weaknesses and sinfulness. They too are struggling people who need to overcome sin in their own constitution, both personally and institutionally. The structures and systems of the church needs healing. I therefore agree too, that the Nigerian Catholic Bishop Conference, must also react to this unfolding drama, and call the shot in ensuring a transparent investigation, rather than pretend nothing is happening. As I stated in my first post, here in Ireland, like the rest of the world, principally in the United States, Australia, Austria, and elsewhere, we have had to deal increasingly with this situation, in a way that is saddening. In this vein, while I would like to gloss over Prisca, unintelligible ravings and rantings, I must state that I loved the Nigerian people, and I love the Church. Nonetheless, I would not subject issues like this to mere sentimentalism, without drawing acutely upon the various vignettes to see how best to resolve this- especially mainly for Dolores Atwood, who is a pained and allegedly violated victim. But more significantly, one has also to be concerned that while Dolores case may be germane, some fake people who hate any priest or public figure can just create hoaxes that would damage the reputation of a good public official. This would also be unfair. In today's world, the legal system is the definitive arbiter in "she-say-he-say."
On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 03:07 pm, Irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
This is getting more elaborately official now. It is in today's Irish Times that the Vatican is investigating this case.- Hosted by Back to Google NewsArchbishop accused of sex assault (UKPA) – 7 minutes ago An Irish archbishop is accused of sexually assaulting a teenage girl in Africa before having a 20-year affair with her, it has emerged. The Vatican is investigating a complaint made against Archbishop Richard Burke, who stepped down from his post with the Archdiocese of Benin in Nigeria earlier this year. He is one of the most senior members of the Catholic Church to be accused of assaulting a minor. Archbishop Richard Burke was a member of St Patrick's Missionary Society, based in Kiltegan, Co Wicklow. In a statement the society, also known as the Kiltegan Fathers, confirmed it received a complaint from the woman last December. "She alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Richard Burke," it said. "We expressed the deep sorrow and regret of the society for the suffering the complainant and her family are going through and we affirmed the society's commitment to child protection. The society offered to provide counselling for the complainant." Archbishop Burke, who is from Co Tipperary, was ordained a priest 34 years ago and later worked as a missionary in Nigeria. He became an archbishop in 2008. It is alleged he sexually assaulted the victim in April 1983, when she was a 14-year-old patient in a hospital. The victim, a married 41-year-old mother of three who now lives in Canada, maintains she also had a relationship with the cleric for more than two decades. Archbishop Burke withdrew from ministry while the complaint is being investigated. Copyright © 2009 The Press Association. All rights reserved. Related articles Abuse llegations against archbishop investigated Irish Times - 20 minutes ago Archbishop accused of sex assault The Press Association - 2 hours ago Rome investigating abuse complaint RTE.ie - 5 hours ago More coverage (1) »
On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 03:45 pm, Johnson Grant writes:
Fr patrick corcoran, what kind of a man are you? No shame? I read through your writing, all I see, is unstable person,changing his strory and views like a papper being blow around by the wind to different dirrection. You are not a good priest. I do not mean to offend you,but it is the truth. You miss lead richard burke, thinking you know it all and you are doing just that in this forum.All that prisca wrote about you is true. You are going to reap all that you had sow. You are happy to be the first one to annouced the bad news to this forun. What the man did was wrong, however ,should you be the first to annouce it? You are a trator. i just want to let you know that.
On Sunday, October 25, 2009 at 04:26 pm, irishcanonlawyerpriester writes:
It seems that Prisca and Johnson Grant and one and the same person- except for the split personality. The language and mode of writing are the same with their flawed English, punctuations, that are typically characteristic. I wonder, where the name of Fr. Patrick Corcoran comes from. You seem to be a manufacturer of identity- such an industry! Who is Fr. Patrick Corcoran? This priest did something to you, and you cannot voice, and you prefer to hide under the cloak of Dolores story, then come out and be bold like Dolores, who has shown tenacity and audacity. You also seem to read superficially, maybe less than a fourth grade student. Anyway, my friend, you are truly a unique character among humans! You surely enjoy chaos and all that make you feel relevant. Good luck, small and myopic mind- and of course not to add psycho. In that I can only hope that you seek a good psychiatrist for help.
We all have sinned and have fallen short of Gods Glory so please pple reason before u talk and do not act like saints for we r all sinners. Pray for him to have a good life after the trials. Some pple making comments have done worse than him so before u make any commment look at your self and be sure u r holier than him
ReplyDeleteIf that is so, then God should not judge anyone. Everyone can do what they want and just go to heaven, because we dont have to judge. I am a sin, but abuse children, that is very serius. He owns that poor woman alot.
ReplyDeletelet God b the judge. let us first remove the plank on our eyes before removing others. charity begins at home.
ReplyDelete